[1]陈闻,邱海嵊,於修龄,等.不同施肥处理对3种海岛樟科树种苗木生长的影响[J].浙江林业科技,2023,43(04):114-121.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2023.04.015]
 CHEN Wen,QIU Haisheng,YU Xiuling,et al.Effect of Different Fertilization Treatments on Growth of Three Species of Lauraceae in Island[J].Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology,2023,43(04):114-121.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2023.04.015]
点击复制

不同施肥处理对3种海岛樟科树种苗木生长的影响()
分享到:

《浙江林业科技》[ISSN:1001-3776/CN:33-1112/S]

卷:
43
期数:
2023年04期
页码:
114-121
栏目:
研究简报
出版日期:
2023-07-21

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effect of Different Fertilization Treatments on Growth of Three Species of Lauraceae in Island
文章编号:
1001-3776(2023)04-0114-08
作者:
陈闻12邱海嵊1於修龄2吴海平1贺位忠1
1.舟山市林业科学研究院,浙江 舟山 316000;2.浙江农林大学 环境与资源学院,浙江 杭州 311300
Author(s):
CHEN Wen12QIU Haisheng1YU Xiuling2WU Haiping1HE Weizhong1
1.Zhoushan Forestry Academyof Zhejiang, Zhoushan 316000, China;2.School of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Zhejiang A & F University, Hangzhou 311300, China
关键词:
普陀樟红楠舟山新木姜子施肥黄腐酸苗木生长
Keywords:
Cinnamomum japonicum var. chenii Machilus thunbergia Neolitsea sericea fertilization fulvic acid seedling growth
分类号:
S606;S792.23
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2023.04.015
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为了解不同施肥方式对普陀樟Cinnamomumjaponicumvar.chenii、红楠Machilusthunbergii、舟山新木姜子Neolitseasericea3种海岛樟科Lauraceae树种苗木生长和植株养分累积的影响,本研究通过盆栽试验,对比了不施肥(CK)、施用有机肥(Y)、复合肥(F)及混合肥(YF),对苗木株高、地径生长的影响和植株养分累积的影响。结果表明:(1)施用有机肥(6g·株-1)对普陀樟苗木的株高、地径生长促进效果最佳,分别较CK提高了7.54%和95.07%;施用混合肥(3g·株-1),对红楠、舟山新木姜子的株高和地径生长具有最佳的促进效果。(2)从3个树种苗木的养分分布特征来看,N、P元素主要积累在根部和叶片,K元素则在根部含量较高;从不同处理比较来看,在复合肥处理和混合肥处理下苗木不同部位N元素的积累量显著高于有机肥处理和CK。不同施肥处理苗木的P元素含量与CK相比无显著差异,只有在复合肥9g·株-1水平下,普陀樟苗木根部的K含量显著高于CK(P<0.05)。(3)相关性分析及Manteltest检验结果显示,土壤pH值对红楠的生长与具有显著的负驱动作用(P<0.01),较低的pH值对红楠苗木生长有较大的抑制作用;土壤N含量对3个树种的株高、地径生长具有正驱动作用(P<0.01)。但是N元素过多积累不利于这3个树种苗木的株高、地径生长,而P和K元素的含量对植物的生长影响并不大。上述研究结果表明,不同苗木对养分需求不同,对普陀樟来说,施用6g·株-1有机肥能达到最佳育苗效果;对红楠和舟山新木姜子苗木而言,施用3g·株-1混合肥的育苗效果最佳。
Abstract:
On April 30, 2022, 3-year seedlings of Cinnamomum japonicum var. chenii, Machilus thunbergia and Neolitsea sericea were potted in Zhoushan, Zhejiang province. Experiment was conducted on fertilization of different quantity of organic fertilizer (Y), compound fertilizer (F) and mixture of organic fertilizer and compound fertilizer (YF), with non fertilizer as CK on May 8, 2022. On September 22, 2022, the test finished and determination was implemented on height and ground diameter of seedlings, as well as on soil physio-chemical properties and nutrient content in different organs of seedlings. The results revealed that seedling treated by organic fertilizer (6 g/plant) had the best effect of height and ground diameter growth of C. japonicum var. chenii’s (increased by 7.54 and 95.07 % compared with CK). For M. thunbergia and N. sericea, the mixture fertilizer (3 g/plant) had the best effect on height and ground diameter. Accumulation of N and P of tested seedlings occurred mainly in root and leaves. In contrast, the accumulation of K only occurred in root. Accumulation of N at different organs of seedlings treated by compound fertilizer and mixture fertilizer was larger than that treated by organic fertilizer and CK. P content in treated seedling had no great difference with that in the control. K content at root of C. japonicum var. chenii treated by compound fertilizer of 9 g/plan was evidently higher than that of CK. Correlation analysis and mantel test resulted that the soil pH had negative relation with growth of M. thunbergia (P<0.01). The N content in soil had positive relation with height and ground diameter growth of three species (P<0.01). The effect of P and K content had no great effect on growth. The result indicated that organic fertilizer of 6 g/plant had the best effect for C. japonicum var. chenii, whereas mixture of 3 g/plant fertilizer for M. thunbergia and N. sericea.

参考文献/References:

[1] 俞慈英,李修鹏,赵慈良,等.普陀樟生物学特性与栽培技术[J].林业科学,2008,44(09):65-71.
[2] 李修鹏,赵慈良,俞慈英,等.舟山新木姜子保存技术研究[J].浙江海洋学院学报(自然科学版),2009,28(01):81-85.
[3] 王国明,赵慈良,陈叶平,等.舟山群岛国家重点保护野生植物区系与分布特征[J].浙江林业科技,2009,29(03):43-47.
[4] 徐斌芬,王国明,陈斌,等.舟山新木姜子和普陀樟容器育苗试验[J].林业科技开发,2007(05):71-73.
[5] 李修鹏,俞慈英,汪成林,等.普陀樟强化育苗技术[J].浙江林学院学报,2009,26(03):384-388.
[6] 费引海.红楠的采种和繁育[J].浙江林业,2004(07):30-31.
[7] 李国雷,刘勇,祝燕,等.苗木稳态营养加载技术研究进展[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2011,35(02):117-123.
[8] 林国祚,彭彦,谢耀坚.我国苗木培育水肥管理研究进展[J].桉树科技,2011,28(01):61-66.
[9] 全国肥料和土壤调理剂标准化技术委员会.黄腐酸原料及肥料术语:GB/T38072-2019[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2019.
[10] 张常书,左文.黄腐酸的生物活性及应用研究[J].磷肥与复肥,2018,33(03):21-23.
[11] 高伟,李明悦,杨军,等.黄腐酸钾不同用量对番茄产量、品质及土壤理化性质的影响[J].中国农学通报,2017,33(33):46-49.
[12] 俞丹萍,孙萍,周坚,等.黄腐酸钾作为基肥在葡萄上施用效果的研究[J].现代园艺,2022(18):1-3.
[13] 刘世昌,任先顺,王子浩,等.生化黄腐酸钾对玉米生长的影响[J].黑龙江农业科学,2022(09):51-54.
[14] 王潇潇,伍宏,陈思衡,等.黄腐酸对水稻幼苗根系生长的影响及其与生长素的关系[J].西北植物学报,2022,42(05):811-818.
[15] 谢真铭,范芳娟.黄腐酸钾有机肥对杨梅衰弱树复壮的作用[J].浙江农业科学,2018,59(10):1779-1780,1790.
[16] 高云晓,庞云湘,毛培利,等.黄腐酸有机肥对盐胁迫下刺槐幼苗生长的影响[J].西南林业大学学报(自然科学),2019,39(02):36-43.
[17] 郭星,谢飞,闫倩倩,等.黄腐酸对白龙江干旱河谷5种苗木抗旱性的影响[J].草业学报,2018,27(08):86-94.
[18] 陈闻,王晶,叶正钱,等.施肥对普陀樟苗木生长及养分吸收利用的影响[J].浙江农林大学学报,2014,31(03):358-366.
[19] 徐嘉科,陈闻,王晶,等.不同施肥方式对红楠生长及营养特性的影响[J].生态学杂志,2015,34(05):1241-1245.
[20] 陈闻,王晶,费行海,等.不同施肥方式对普陀樟苗木生长及养分的影响[J].安徽农业大学学报,2015,42(03):381-386.
[21] 费行海,徐嘉科,陈闻,等.不同施肥处理对3种海岛树种苗木生长及造林效果的影响[J].山东林业科技,2014,44(03):50-53.
[22] 鲁如坤.土壤农业化学分析方法[M].北京:中国农业科技出版社,2000:12-13,146-195,302-315.
[23] 伍杰,刘燕云,兰常军,等.土壤pH值对康定木兰幼苗生长的影响[J].四川林业科技,2017,38(03):88-92.
[24] 唐晓杰,白玉文,张涛,等.土壤类型与酸碱度对紫杉生长发育的影响[J].北华大学学报(自然科学版),2015,16(04):515-517.
[25] 马庆华,王兴红,蔡京艳,等.氮磷供应水平对野蔷薇生长和养分吸收的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学,2022,59(03):609-616.
[26] 叶可可,李庆梅,祝燕,等.油松容器苗和裸根苗生长与造林效果对秋季施肥的响应[J/OL].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版).https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/32.1161.S.20220906.0906.002.html.
[27] 龙海燕,邓伦秀,徐超然,等.氮磷钾配方施肥对贵州金花茶生长及根系形态的影响[J]. 贵州农业科学,2022,50(08):25-33.
[28] 林文欢,朱晓武,吴悦宏,等.氮磷钾施肥配比对中华楠苗木生长的影响[J]. 林业与环境科学,2021,37(06):142-147.

相似文献/References:

[1]贺位忠,吴初平,高大海,等.普陀樟容器苗根系的动态生长与垂直分布特征[J].浙江林业科技,2015,35(02):67.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2022-11-20;修回日期:2023-03-25
基金项目:浙江省土壤污染生物修复重点实验室开放基金项目(FSLAB2020006);2021 年浙江省林业专项资金项目;舟山市科技计划项目(2019C31034)
作者简介:
作者简介:陈闻,工程师,从事植物营养与土壤肥料研究;E-mail: 234928596@qq.com。
通信作者:贺位忠,教授级高级工程师,从事森林培育研究;E-mail: 454462278@qq.com。
更新日期/Last Update: 2023-07-20