[1]陈超,金则新,袁梦,等.遮荫对景宁玉兰幼苗生理生化季节变化的影响[J].浙江林业科技,2024,44(02):35-42.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2024.02.005]
 CHEN Chao,JIN Zexin,YUAN Meng,et al.Effect of Shading on Seasonal Change of Physiology and BIochemistry of YulanIa sinostellata Seedlings[J].Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology,2024,44(02):35-42.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2024.02.005]
点击复制

遮荫对景宁玉兰幼苗生理生化季节变化的影响()
分享到:

《浙江林业科技》[ISSN:1001-3776/CN:33-1112/S]

卷:
44
期数:
2024年02期
页码:
35-42
栏目:
出版日期:
2024-03-29

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effect of Shading on Seasonal Change of Physiology and BIochemistry of YulanIa sinostellata Seedlings
文章编号:
1001-3776(2024)02-0035-08
作者:
陈超1234金则新23袁梦123罗光宇123李月灵23单方权5
1.上海师范大学 生命科学学院,上海 200234;2.台州学院 生态研究所,浙江 台州 318000;3.台州学院 浙江省植物进化生态学与保护重点实验室,浙江 台州 318000;4.台州南水环保科技有限公司,浙江 台州 318000;5.台州市绿心旅游开发促进中心,浙江 台州 318000
Author(s):
CHEN Chao125354JIN Zexin2535YUAN Meng12535LUO Guangyu12535LI Yueling2535SHAN Fangquan5
1.College of Life Sciences, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 200234, China;2.Institute of Ecology, Taizhou University, Taizhou 318000, China;3.Key Lab of Evolutional Ecology and Protection of Zhejiang, Taizhou University, Taizhou 318000, China;4.Taizhou Nanshui Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd;5.Taizhou 318000, China
关键词:
遮荫景宁玉兰净光合速率光合色素抗氧化系统季节动态
Keywords:
shading Yulania sinostellata net photosynthetic rate photosynthetic pigment antioxidant system seasonal change
分类号:
Q948;S685.15
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2024.02.005
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
以2年生景宁玉兰Yulaniasinostellata幼苗为研究对象,通过遮阳网设置自然光强的100%(I100)、40%(I40)和10%(I10)3种遮荫处理,探讨不同遮荫处理下景宁玉兰生理生化特性的季节变化规律。结果表明:(1)景宁玉兰幼苗的净光合速率(Pn)春季为I100处理显著高于I40、I10处理(P<0.05),夏、秋季为I40处理显著高于I100、I10处理(P<0.05)。I100、I40处理的Pn在夏季显著高于春、秋季(P<0.05),而I10处理的Pn在夏季则显著低于春、秋季(P<0.05)。(2)3个季节的叶绿素(Chl)含量均随着遮荫强度的增加而增加,而类胡萝卜素/叶绿素(Car/Chl)值随着遮荫强度的增加而下降。3种遮荫处理的叶绿素、类胡萝卜素含量均以春季最高,叶绿素a/b(Chla/b)、Car/Chl值均以夏季最大。(3)春、秋季超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)活性随着遮荫强度的增加而下降。夏、秋季过氧化物酶(POD)随着遮荫强度的增加而升高,过氧化氢酶(CAT)活性以I100处理较低。3种遮荫处理SOD活性以秋季最高,POD、CAT活性均以春季最高。(4)3个季节的抗坏血酸(AsA)含量以I10处理最低。谷胱甘肽(GSH)含量夏季以I100处理最高,秋季以I40处理最高。(5)I100处理夏季的电导率显著高于I10处理(P<0.05),秋季则显著高于I40、I10处理(P<0.05)。3种处理电导率均以秋季最高,春季最低。总之,I100处理的景宁玉兰幼苗在夏、秋季叶绿素含量较低,并且POD、CAT活性较弱,无法有效清除活性氧,致使细胞膜透性增加,叶片受到光胁迫。而I10处理由于光强过低使得光合能力弱。因此在栽培过程中,适当遮荫有利于景宁玉兰的生长,但光照强度不应低于40%。
Abstract:
In early January 2020, two-year Yulania sinostellata seedlings were transplanted in pot in Linhai, Zhejiang province. Experiments were conducted on seedlings by full light intensity (I100) (CK), shading of 40% (I40) and 10% (I10) of natural light intensity. Net photosynthetic rate (Pn), photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) and photosynthetic pigment of treated seedlings was determined on April 17th, July 12th and October 15th 2020. The result showed that Pn of the control was significantly higher than that under I40 and I10 in spring, and that under I40 was significantly higher than that of the control and I10 in summer and autumn. Pn of the control and I40 was significantly higher in summer than in spring and autumn, while Pn of I10 was significantly lower in summer than in spring and autumn. Chlorophyll (Chl) content had positive relation with shading intensity in the experimental period, while carotenoid/chlorophyll (Car/Chl) had negative one. The chlorophyll and carotenoid contents of treated seedlings were the highest in spring, and the chlorophyll a/b (Chl a/b) and Car/Chl were the highest in summer. The activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD) decreased with the increase of shade intensity in spring and autumn. The peroxidase (POD) activity increased with the increase of shade intensity in summer and autumn, and the catalase (CAT) activity was lower in the control. SOD activity was the highest in autumn, POD and CAT activity was the highest in spring under the three shade treatments. The content of ascorbic acid (AsA) in three seasons was the lowest under I10 treatment. The content of glutathione (GSH) was the highest in the control in summer and under I40 in autumn. The electrical conductivity of the control in summer was significantly higher than that under I10, and in autumn was significantly higher than that under I40 and I10. The electrical conductivity of treated seedlings was the highest in autumn and the lowest in spring with significant difference. The experiment demonstrated that chlorophyll content of Y. sinostellata seedlings of the control was lower in summer and autumn, and POD and CAT activities were weaker, which could not effectively remove reactive oxygen, causing increase of cell membrane permeability and light stress on leaves. However, seedlings under I10 had lower photosynthetic capacity.

参考文献/References:

[1] HROUDOVA Z, ZAKRAVSKY P. Germination responses of diploid Butomus umbellatus to light, temperature and flooding[J]. Flora,2003,198 (1):37-44.
[2] MONNEVEUX P,PASTENES C,REYNOLDS M P. Limitations to photosynthesis under light and heat stress in three high-yielding wheat genotypes[J]. J Plant Physiol,2003,160(6):657-666.
[3] KATAHATA S,NARAMOTO M,KAKUBARI Y,et al. Photosynthetic capacity and nitrogen partitioning in foliage of the evergreen shrub Daphniphyllum humile along a natural light gradient[J]. Tree Physiol,2007,27(2):199-208.
[4] 柴胜丰,庄雪影,韦霄,等. 光照强度对濒危植物毛瓣金花茶光合生理特性的影响[J]. 西北植物学报,2013,33(3):547-554.
[5] 李小琴,张凤良,杨湉,等. 遮阴对濒危植物风吹楠幼苗叶形态和光合参数的影响[J]. 植物生理学报,2019,55(1):80-90.
[6] 罗光宇,陈超,李月灵,等. 光照强度对濒危植物长序榆光合特性的影响[J]. 生态学杂志,2021,40(4):980-988.
[7] 李冬林,金雅琴,崔梦凡,等. 遮光对连香树幼苗光合特性及其叶片解剖结构的影响[J]. 西北植物学报,2019,39(6):1053-1063.
[8] 黄相玲,朱栗琼,陈惠昕,等. 三种罗汉松季节性生理生化指标变化比较[J]. 广东农业科学,2018,45(6):44-49.
[9] 熊静,王臣,邢文黎,等. 朱砂根幼苗在不同光照强度下的形态和生理响应[J]. 植物科学学报,2018,36(5):736-744.
[10] LIU Y J,ZHANG W,WANG Z B,et al. Influence of shading on photosynthesis and antioxidative activities of enzymes in apple trees[J]. Photosynthetica,2019,57(3):857-865.
[11] 王穗子,金则新,李月灵,等. 铜胁迫条件下 AMF 对海州香薷光合色素含量、抗氧化能力和膜脂过氧化的影响[J]. 生态学报,2015, 35(23):7699-7708.
[12] 李先民,刘新亮,李春牛,等. 不同光照条件下杜鹃红山茶幼苗的生长效应及抗氧化生理响应[J]. 热带作物学报,2019,40(4):688-692.
[13] 金贇,朱栗琼,招礼军,等. 滨海沙地植物厚藤叶片生理特征的季节变化[J/OL]. 广西植物,2021:1-14. [2021-12-07]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/45.1134.Q.20210818.1723.014.html.
[14] 江洁蓓,梁玲,张腾驹,等. 粉红珙桐叶片呈色相关生理特性的季节变化[J]. 西北植物学报,2019,39(11):2019-2027.
[15] 刘饶,徐端妙,潘智慧,等. 景宁木兰濒危原因初探[J]. 河北农业科学,2009,13(6):31-32.
[16] 杜有新,吴伟建,季志利,等. 濒危植物景宁玉兰的萌条形态特征分析[J]. 生态科学,2018,37(5):152-156.
[17] 卢璐,作泽智,刘雪燕,等. 景宁木兰花粉萌发与贮藏特性研究[J]. 植物研究,2014,34(2):182-187.
[18] YU W W,YANG L,SONG L L,et al. Effect of differential light quality on morphology,photosynthesis,and antioxidant enzyme activity in Camptotheca acuminata seedlings[J]. J Plant Grow Regul,2017,36(1):148-160.
[19] 张志良,瞿伟菁,李小方. 植物生理学实验指导:第4版[M]. 北京:高等教育出版社,2008:46-48.
[20] 李合生,孙群,赵世杰. 植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M]. 北京:高等教育出版社,2000:246-250.
[21] 李玲,李娘辉,蒋素梅,等. 植物生理学模块实验指导[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2009:175-177.
[22] NI Y W,LIN K H,CHEN K H,et al. Flavonoid compounds and photosynthesis in Passiflora plant leaves under varying light intensities[J]. Plants,2020,9(5):633.
[23] ZHANG J,LIU J,YANG C,et al. Photosynthetic performance of soybean plants to water deficit under high and low light intensity[J]. S Afric J Bot,2016,105:279-287.
[24] ZHANG J J,ZHU L,ZHANG X,et al. Photosynthetic performance and growth responses of Liriope muscari (Decne.)L.H. Bailey (Asparagaceae)planted within poplar forests having different canopy densities[J]. BMC Ecol,2020,20(1):25.
[25] 石凯,李泽,张伟建,等. 不同光照对油桐幼苗生长、光合日变化及叶绿素荧光参数的影响[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报,2018,38(8):35-42,50.
[26] DAI Y J,SHEN Z G,LIU Y,et al. Effects of shade treatments on the photosynthetic capacity,chlorophyll fluorescence,and chlorophyll content of Tetrastigma hemsleyanum Diels et Gilg[J]. Environ Exp Bot,2009,65(2-3):177-182.
[27] TANG H,HU Y Y,YU W W,et al. Growth,photosynthetic and physiological responses of Torreya grandis seedlings to varied light environments[J]. Trees,2015,29(4):1011-1022.
[28] HAO C Y,FAN R,WU H S,et al. Physiological response of Monimopetalum chinense to light stress under habitat fragmentation[J]. Plant Soil Environ,2010,56(12):551-556.
[29] 康娜娜,杜海烨,成莎,等. 彩色棉抗氧化酶活性与棉纤维发育相关性研究[J]. 山西农业科学,2018,46(3):365-370.
[30] LIU X Z,HUANG B R. Heat stress injury in relation to membrane lipid peroxidation in creeping bentgrass[J]. Crop Sci,2000,40(2):503-510.
[31] CONTIN D R,SORIANI H H,HERNANDEZ I, et al. Antioxidant and photoprotective defenses in response to gradual water stress under low and high irradiance in two Malvaceae tree species used for tropical forest restoration[J]. Trees-struct Funct,2014,28(6):1705-1722.
[32] 王玉卓,谷宇琛,巢建国,等. 强光胁迫对茅苍术生长、生理生化及关键酶基因表达的影响[J]. 中国实验方剂学杂志,2020,26(10):119-127.
[33] 孙思淼,常伟,宋福强. 丛枝菌根真菌提高盐胁迫植物抗氧化机制的研究进展[J]. 应用生态学报,2020,31(10):3589-3596.
[34] SHAFIQ I,HUSSAIN S,RAZA M A,et al. Crop photosynthetic response to light quality and light intensity[J]. J Integr Agr,2021,20(1):4-23.
[35] CHRISTINE H F,GRAHAM N. Ascorbate and glutathione:The heart of the redox hub[J]. Plant Physiol,2011,155(1):2-18.

相似文献/References:

[1]余泽智,陈翔翔,卢 璐,等.玉景宁玉兰种群分布与群落结构研究[J].浙江林业科技,2015,35(03):47.
[2]季必浩,范李节,王宁杭,等.景宁玉兰春季嫁接技术的研究[J].浙江林业科技,2017,37(04):45.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2017.04.008]
 Ji Bi-hao,Fan Li-jie,Wang Ning-hang,et al.Study on Spring Grafting Technology of Magnolia sinostellata[J].Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology,2017,37(02):45.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2017.04.008]
[3]杨华,宋绪忠.低海拔区2 种光照强度对猴头杜鹃光合特性的影响[J].浙江林业科技,2018,38(03):24.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2018.03.004]
 YANG Hua,SONG Xu-zhong.Effects of Different Illumination Intensity on Photosynthetic Properties of Rhododendron simiarum at Low Altitude[J].Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology,2018,38(02):24.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2018.03.004]
[4]夏云飞,李瑞娇,杨在娟,等.光照强度对日本荚蒾幼苗生长和生理特性的影响[J].浙江林业科技,2020,40(03):16.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2020.03.003]
 XIA Yun-fei,LI Rui-jiao,YANG Zai-juan,et al.Effect of Light Intensity on Growth and Physiological Characteristics of Viburnum japonicum Seedlings[J].Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology,2020,40(02):16.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2020.03.003]
[5]宋绪忠,杨华,余海珍.两种光环境下泰顺杜鹃和鹿角杜鹃光合特性的日变化[J].浙江林业科技,2023,43(02):17.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2023.02.003]
 SONG Xu-zhong,YANG Hua,YU Hai-zhen.Daily Change of Photosynthetic Properties of Rhododendron taishunense and R. latoucheae under Different Light Condition[J].Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology,2023,43(02):17.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2023.02.003]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2022-01-02;修回日期:2023-12-29
基金项目:浙江省林业发展和资源保护专项计划资助(﹝2017﹞74号)
作者简介:陈超,硕士研究生,从事植物生态学研究;E-mail: 316188591@qq.com。
通信作者:金则新,教授,从事植物生态学研究;E-mail:jzx@tzc.edu.cn。
更新日期/Last Update: 2024-04-10