[1]傅东示,严劲松,姚雨欣,等.植物物候期对城市鸟类群落多样性的影响[J].浙江林业科技,2023,43(04):25-33.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2023.04.004]
 FU Dongshi,YAN Jingsong,YAO Yuxin,et al.Effect of Plant Phenology on Bird Community Diversity[J].Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology,2023,43(04):25-33.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2023.04.004]
点击复制

植物物候期对城市鸟类群落多样性的影响()
分享到:

《浙江林业科技》[ISSN:1001-3776/CN:33-1112/S]

卷:
43
期数:
2023年04期
页码:
25-33
栏目:
出版日期:
2023-07-21

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effect of Plant Phenology on Bird Community Diversity
文章编号:
1001-3776(2023)04-0025-09
作者:
傅东示1严劲松2姚雨欣1杨意帆1张洁1郭婷婷1张聪1幸怡1邵锋1
1.浙江农林大学 风景园林与建筑学院,浙江 杭州 311300;2.杭州西湖风景名胜区 岳庙管理处,浙江 杭州 310007
Author(s):
FU Dongshi1YAN Jingsong2YAO Yuxin1YANG Yifan1ZHANG Jie1GUO Tingting1ZHANG Cong1XING Yi1SHAO Feng1
1.School of Landscape Architecture, Zhejiang A & F University, Hangzhou 311300, China;2.Yue Temple Office, Hangzhou West Lake Scenic Area of Zhejiang, Hangzhou 310007, China
关键词:
植物物候期城市鸟类鸟类多样性食源植物居留型
Keywords:
plant phenophases birds bird diversity feeding plant residence type
分类号:
S731.9,Q959.7
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2023.04.004
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为探究植物物候与鸟类群落多样性的相关性,以浙江农林大学东湖校区春夏季校园植物和鸟类为研究对象,以“候”(pentad)(5d)为物候期时间分布特征分析的基本单位,候序为描述物候现象发生早晚的基本变量,于2022年2月4日至9月27日进行植物及鸟类的物候观测,基于物候频率曲线及频数分布划分季相,并采用Shannon-Wiener多样性指数、Pielou均匀度指数和Margalef丰富度指数计算鸟类群落多样性。结果表明:(1)在2022年6—20候为春季,21—44候为夏季,以芽、叶、花和果的物候期为主;在春夏季共记录鸟类16目42科82属107种,其中留鸟52种(47.27%)、夏候鸟28种(25.45%)、冬候鸟19种(17.27%)、旅鸟11种(10.00%),其中苍鹭Ardeacinerea、大白鹭Ardeaalba和黑短脚鹎Hypsipetesleucocephalus存在两种居留型。(2)鸟类群落的Shannon-Wiener多样性指数、Pielou均匀度指数和Margalef丰富度指数最大值分别位于14候(1.4406)、25候(0.3934)和20候(9.8066);春季鸟类多样性及丰富度高于夏季的,均匀度略低于夏季的;春季可食部分物候期增加对植食性鸟类数量具有正向影响。综合以上结果,建议城市绿化按物候规律选择鸟类取食植物,保留植株宿存果,栽植常绿树种和翌年结果植物以减缓春夏交替时的食物短缺,并尽量减少刈割等对草本植物发芽、生长、开花和结实等生活史阶段的影响。
Abstract:
In order to explore the correlation between plant phenophase and bird community diversity, observations on vegetation and birds was conducted from February 4 to September 27, 2022 in Donghu Campus of Zhejiang A & F University. Pentad (5 days) was used as the basic unit for the analysis of the time distribution characteristics of phenology, and pentad sequence as basic variable to describe the occurrence of phenological phenomena. The seasonal phases were divided by phenological frequency curve and frequency distribution. Bird community diversity was calculated by Shannon-Wiener diversity, Pielou evenness and Margalef richness index. The result showed that the 6th-20th pentad in 2022 was spring, and the 21st-44th pentad was summer, with buds, leaves, flowers and fruits as the main phenological stage. A total of 107 species of bird of 82 genera and 42 families of 16 orders were recorded, among them, 52 species of resident birds (47.27%), 28 species of summer migratory birds (25.45%), 19 species of winter migratory birds (17.27%) and 11 species of travelers (10.00%). There were two resident species of Ardea cinerea, Ardea alba, Hypsipetes leucocephalus. And the highest values of Shannon-Wiener diversity, Pielou evenness and Margalef richness index were at the 14th (1.440 6), 25th (0.393 4) and 20th pentad (9.806 6). The diversity and richness of birds in spring were higher than that in summer, and the evenness was slightly lower than that in summer. Increase of the edible part of plants in spring had positive effect on the number of plant-feeding birds.

参考文献/References:

[1] YONG D L,BARTON P S,OKADA S,et al. Birds as surrogates for mammals and reptiles: Are patterns of cross-taxonomic associations stable over time in a human-modified landscape[J]. Ecol Indic,2016,69:152-164.
[2] YANG X R,TAN X W,CHEN C W,et al. The influence of urban park characteristics on bird diversity in Nanjing, China[J]. Avian Res,2020, 11(1):475-483.
[3] 张征恺,黄甘霖. 中国城市鸟类学研究进展[J]. 生态学报,2018,38(10):3357-3367.
[4] MBIBA M,MAZHUDE C,FABRICIUS C,et al. Bird species assemblages differ, while functional richness is maintained across an urban landscape[J]. Landscape Urban Plan,2021,212:104094.
[5] OSSOLA A,HAHS A K,NASH M A,et al. Habitat complexity enhances comminution and decomposition processes in urban ecosystems[J]. Ecosystems,2016,19(5):927-941.
[6] 叶淑英,郭书林,路纪琪. 中国城市鸟类生态学研究进展与展望[J]. 河南教育学院学报(自然科学版),2015,24(3):47-53.
[7] CHIQUET C,DOVER J W,MITCHELL P. Birds and the urban environment: The value of green walls[J]. Urban Ecosyst,2013,16(3):453-462.
[8] BLINKOVA O,SHUPOVA T. Bird communities and vegetation composition in the urban forest ecosystem: Correlations and comparisons of diversity indices[J]. Ekológia(Bratislava),2017,36(4):366-387.
[9] 王勇,许洁,杨刚,等. 城市公共绿地常见木本植物组成对鸟类群落的影响[J]. 生物多样性,2014,22(2):196-207.
[10] MALLIKRJUN J,MADEGOWDA J,KUSHALAPPA C,et al. Bird diversity across different vegetation types in Kodagu, Central Western Ghats, India[J]. Int J Zool Res,2016,6(3):25-36.
[11] 徐诗,王成,孙振凯,等. 北京综合性社区鸟类与植物的关系[J]. 中国城市林业,2022,20(2):15-22.
[12] RICO-SILVA J F,CRUZ-TRUJILLO E J,COLORADO G J. Influence of environmental factors on bird diversity in greenspaces in an Amazonian city[J]. Urban Ecosyst,2021,24(2):365-374.
[13] 赵伊琳,王成,白梓彤,等. 城市化鸟类群落变化及其与城市植被的关系[J]. 生态学报,2021,41(2):479-489.
[14] MACHAR I,SIMEK P,SCHLOSSAREK M,et al. Comparison of bird diversity between temperate floodplain forests and urban parks[J]. Urban For Urban Green,2022,67:127427.
[15] MORELLI F,BENEDETTI Y,SU T P,et al. Taxonomic diversity, functional diversity and evolutionary uniqueness in bird communities of Beijing’s urban parks: Effects of land use and vegetation structure[J]. Urban For Urban Green,2017,23:84-92.
[16] 袁玉洁,邹曦,史方,等. 气候变化情景下洞庭湖流域鸟类栖息地适宜性分布研究[J]. 水生态学杂志,2022,43(4):56-61.
[17] GILLINGS S,BALMER D E,FULLER R J. Directionality of recent bird distribution shifts and climate change in Great Britain[J]. Global Change Biol,2015,21(6):2155-2168.
[18] 吴伟伟,徐海根,吴军,等. 气候变化对鸟类影响的研究进展[J]. 生物多样性,2012,20(1):108-115.
[19] WANG N,MAO L F,YANG X T,et al. High plant species richness and stable climate lead to richer but phylogenetically and functionally clustered avifaunas[J]. J Biogeogr,2020,47(9):1945-1954.
[20] 宛敏渭,刘秀珍. 中国物候观测方法[M]. 北京:科学出版社,1979:1-8.
[21] 章旭日,李贺鹏,岳春雷,等. 浙江省鸟类多样性与区系分析[J]. 野生动物学报,2019,40(3):685-699.
[22] 张荣祖. 中国动物地理[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2011:104-107.
[23] 许允定. 高校植物园植物群落特征与生态评价[D]. 杭州:浙江农林大学,2015.
[24] 贾月,陆秋燕,鲁庆彬. 浙江青山湖鸟类及其季节变化[J]. 浙江林学院学报,2010,27(2):278-286.
[25] 金水虎,刘守赞. 浙江农林大学常见植物图鉴[M]. 北京:中国林业出版社,2020:1-310.
[26] 郝璞玉. 农林故事·生态育人[EB/OL]. https://www.zafu.edu.cn/info/1002/95919.htm,2021-12-20.
[27]《浙江植物志(新编)》编辑委员会. 浙江植物志(新编)[M]. 杭州:浙江科学技术出版社,2021:1-722.
[28] 邢小艺,郝培尧,李冠衡,等. 北京植物物候的季节动态特征—以北京植物园为例[J]. 植物生态学报,2018,42(9):906-916.
[29] 刘阳,陈水华. 中国鸟类观察手册[M]. 长沙:湖南科学技术出版社,2021:1-686.
[30] 诸葛阳. 浙江动物志鸟类[M]. 杭州:浙江科学技术出版社,1990:1-461.
[31] 丁平,张正旺,梁伟,等. 中国森林鸟类[M]. 长沙:湖南科学技术出版社,2019:1-947.
[32] 马志军,陈水华. 中国海洋与湿地鸟类[M]. 长沙:湖南科学技术出版社,2018:1-595.
[33] 陈效逑,曹志萍. 植物物候期的频率分布型及其在季节划分中的应用[J]. 地理科学,1999,19(1):21-27.
[34] MAGURRAN A E,MCGILL B J. 生物多样性—测量与评估前沿(2011)[M]. 韩博平,官昭瑛,杨阳,译. 北京:科学出版社,2019:67-80.
[35] 陈沁,唐欣然,薛乾怀,等. 亚热带植物春季和秋季物候格局及其对气候变化的响应[J]. 广西植物,2022,42(7):1105-1115.
[36] 朱曦,陈勤娟,詹伟君,等. 杭州市鸟类区系研究[J]. 浙江林学院学报,2002,19(1):36-47.
[37] 杨琪,李书恒,李家豪,等. 西安4种落叶乔木物候期对气候变化的响应[J]. 生态学报,2022,42(4):1462-1473.
[38] 于赐刚,郭晓平,马月,等. 浙江松阳县鸟类群落结构和多样性分析[J/OL]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2022:1-7 [2022-10-31].https://kns-cnki-net.webvpn.zafu.edu.cn/kcms/detail/32.1161.S.20220907.1421.004.html.
[39] SCHUTZ C,SCHULZE CH. Functional diversity of urban bird communities: Effects of landscape composition, green space area and vegetation cover[J]. Ecol Evolut,2015,5(22):5230-5239.
[40] 何海燕,王楠,董路. 北京城市鸟类对食源植物利用规律[J]. 动物学杂志,2021,56(4):491-499.
[41] 黄润峰,李海生,陈嘉瑜,等. 广州海珠国家湿地公园鸟类食源植物研究[J]. 生态科学,2021,40(1):52-61.
[42] 王茜,刘智存,刘天宇,等. 城市鸟类多样性研究中的多维度探索研究进展[J]. 生态学杂志,2022(10):2058-2063.
[43] 朱曦. 浙江临安城郊鸟类初步研究Ⅰ春夏季鸟类的组成与生态分布[J]. 浙江林学院科技通讯,1983,2:62-70.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2023-01-17;修回日期:2023-03-28
作者简介:傅东示,硕士研究生,从事风景园林植物应用研究;E-mail: fudongshi@stu.zafu.edu.cn。
通信作者:邵锋,副教授,博士,从事风景园林植物应用研究;E-mail: shaofeng@zafu.edu.cn。
更新日期/Last Update: 2023-07-20