[1]张建,袁少飞,范慧,等.5 种防腐防霉剂对重组竹材抑菌效果的影响[J].浙江林业科技,2016,36(05):8-12.
 ZHANG Jian,YUAN Shao-fei,FAN Hui,et al.Effect of Different Antimildew and Antiseptic Agentson Reconstructed Bamboo Timber[J].Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology,2016,36(05):8-12.
点击复制

5 种防腐防霉剂对重组竹材抑菌效果的影响()
分享到:

《浙江林业科技》[ISSN:1001-3776/CN:33-1112/S]

卷:
36
期数:
2016年05期
页码:
8-12
栏目:
出版日期:
2016-11-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effect of Different Antimildew and Antiseptic Agentson Reconstructed Bamboo Timber
作者:
张建1袁少飞1范慧12李琴1王洪艳1
1.浙江省林业科学研究院浙江省竹类研究重点实验室,浙江杭州 310023;2.浙江农林大学,浙江临安 311300
Author(s):
ZHANG Jian1YUAN Shao-fei1FAN Hui12LI Qin1WANG Hong-yan1
1. Key Lab of Bamboo Research of Zhejiang, Zhejiang Forestry Academy, Hangzhou 310023, China;2. Zhejiang A & F University, Lin’an 311300, China
关键词:
重组竹材防腐防霉剂抑菌防治效力质量损失率
Keywords:
reconstructed bamboo timber anti-mildew and antiseptic agent antibacterial control efficiencyweight loss percentage
分类号:
S782.33
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
采用氨溶季铵铜(ACQ),铜唑(CuAz),丙环唑和戊唑醇(ZJFC-Ⅰ),壳聚糖铜配位聚合物(CCC),碘代丙炔基丁基甲胺酸酯、丙环唑、戊唑醇(PINSKAN)5 种防腐防霉剂,分别调配成0.5%,1.0%和1.5% 3 种浓度;采用桔青霉(Penicillam citrinum)、绿色木霉(Trichoderma viride)和黑曲霉(Aspergillus niger)3 种霉菌,绵腐卧孔菌(Poria placenta)和彩绒革盖菌(Coriolus versicolor)2 种腐朽菌对毛竹(Phyllostachys heterocycla cv.pubescens)炭化重组竹材进行防腐防霉性能研究。结果表明:处理后的重组竹材抑菌能力明显提高,载药量随着防腐防霉剂溶液浓度的增加而增加,载药量越大,重组竹材抑菌效果越好。浓度为1.0%的ZJFC-Ⅰ和浓度为1.5%的ACQ 对3 种霉菌防治效力最好,均达100%;浓度为1.5%的CuAz 对桔青霉和绿色木霉的防治效力分别为81.25%和87.50%;浓度为1.5%的CCC 和PINSKAN 对黑曲霉的防治效力分别为87.50%和100%。处理后的重组竹材防腐能力提高60.4%以上,平均质量损失率均在3.36%以下,均达到Ⅰ级强耐腐。浓度相同时CuAz 抑制腐朽菌效果最好;未处理重组竹材防霉性能最差,对3 种霉菌防治效力均为0,但具有较好的耐腐能力,平均质量损失率为8.48%,达到Ⅰ级强耐腐。
Abstract:
Carbonized reconstructed bamboo timber was treated by five anti-mildew and antiseptic agents such as ACQ (Ammoniacal CopperQuaternary), CuAz (Copper Triazole), ZJFC-I (Propiconazole and Tebuconazole), CCC (Chitosan Copper Complex), PINSKAN (Iodopropynylbutylcarbamate, Propiconazole and Tebuconazole) with three concentrations like 0.5%, 1.0% and 1.5% to test their antiseptic and antimildew capacitywith Penicillam citrinum, Trichoderma viride, Aspergillus nige, Poria placenta and Coriolus versicolor. The results showed that treated reconstructedbamboo timber had better antiseptic and antimildew. The drug loading had positive relation with agent concentrations, antiseptic and antimildewability. ZJFC-I and ACQ all had better antimildew abilities. 1.0% of ZJFC-I and 1.5% of ACQ had the best antimildew result, topped to 100%. 1.5%of CuAz had 81.25% and 87.50% effect against P. citrinum and T. viride. 1.5% of CCC and PINSKAN had 87.50% and 100% effect against A. niger..The antiseptid abilities of treated reconstructed bamboo timber increased by 60.4% with mean weight loss percentage less than 3.36%, and their decayresistance grade was level I. CuAz had best antibacterial effect with the same concentration of treatments. The control (no treatment) had not anymildew-proof capacity, but it had good antibacterial property with mean weight loss of 8.48%, and decay resistance grade was level I.

参考文献/References:

[1] Jiang Z H.Bamboo and rattan in the world [M]. Beijing:China Forestry Publishing House,2008.
[2] 于文吉. 我国重组竹产业发展现状与趋势分析[J]. 木材工业,2012,26(1):11-14.
[3] 杨峰,宋莎莎,王雪华等. 我国重组竹产业面临的挑战与机遇[J]. 林业经济,2013(8):52-56.
[4] 秦莉,于文吉. 重组竹研究现状与展望[J]. 世界林业研究,2009,22(6):55-59.
[5] 李和麟,陈滔. 高性能重组竹制造技术研究[J]. 世界竹藤通讯,2010,8(4):27-29.
[6] 李琴,华锡奇,戚连忠. 重组竹发展前景展望[J]. 竹子研究汇刊,2001,20(1):76-80.
[7] 秦莉,于文吉,余养伦. 重组竹材耐腐性能的研究[J]. 木材工业,2010,24(4):9-11.
[8] 孙芳利,段新芳竹材防霉研究概况及其展望[J]. 世界竹藤通讯,2004,2(4):1-4.
[9] 王文久,辉朝茂,陈玉惠,等. 竹材霉腐真菌研究[J]. 竹子研究汇刊,2000,19(4):26-34.
[10] 马星霞,蒋明亮,覃道春,等. 我国竹材变色菌和霉菌的分离与鉴定[J]. 竹子研究汇刊,2009,28(4):35-39.
[11] 吴旦人.竹材防护[M]. 长沙:湖南科技技术出版社,1992.
[12] 于文吉,江泽慧,叶克林. 竹材特性研究及其进展[J]. 世界林业研究,2002,15(2):50-55.
[13] Ray A K,Das S K,Mondal S.Microstructural characterization of bamboo[J],J Mater Sci,2004(39):1 055-1 060.
[14] 于文吉,余养伦,江泽慧. 竹材表面胶合性能[J]. 竹子研究汇刊,2006,25(1):30-36.
[15] Lu Kun-Tsung. Effects of hydrogen peroxide treatment on the surface properties and adhesion of ma bamboo (Dendrocalamus latiflorus)[J]Wood Sci,2006(52):173-178.
[16] 侯瑞光,刘元,李贤军,等. 高温热处理对重组竹材物理力学性能的影响[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报,2013,33(2):101-104.
[17] 魏万姝,覃道春. 不同竹龄慈竹重组竹材强度和天然耐久性比较[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2011,35(6):111-115.

相似文献/References:

[1]戴靓,陈华山,余肖红.重组竹材结构连接性能的研究进展[J].浙江林业科技,2016,36(04):81.
 DAI Liang,CHEN Hua-shan,YU Xiao-hong.Advance on Joint Types of Recombined Bamboo Timber[J].Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology,2016,36(05):81.
[2]范慧,张建,鲍建华,等.建筑结构用重组竹材重要性能研究现状及发展趋势[J].浙江林业科技,2017,37(04):100.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2017.04.018]
 FAN Hui,ZHANG Jian,BAO Jian-hua,et al.Current Situation and Trend of Researches on Properties of Bamboo Scrimber for Architectural Structure[J].Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology,2017,37(05):100.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2017.04.018]
[3]龚正,袁少飞,王洪艳,等.重组竹材竹方冷压装料自动化生产线优化设计与分析[J].浙江林业科技,2019,39(06):92.
 GONG Zheng,YUAN Shao-fei,WANG Hong-yan,et al.Design of Feeding Operation from Cold Press Automatic Production Line for Bamboo Scrimber[J].Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology,2019,39(05):92.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2016-06-26;修回日期:2016-08-14基金项目:浙江省科技厅院所专项项目“竹质结构材安全性能研究及其在建筑工程中的应用”(计划编号:2015F50051)作者简介:张建(1978-),男,安徽淮北人,研究员,从事竹木材加工研究。
更新日期/Last Update: 2016-10-20