[1]李皓,董建华,董建明,等.退化与正常山核桃林土壤细菌多样性比较研究[J].浙江林业科技,2017,37(05):42-47.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2017.05.007]
 LI Hao,DONG Jian-hua,DONG Jian-ming,et al.Comparison on Soil Bacteria Diversity between Degrated and Healthy Carya cathayensis Forests[J].Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology,2017,37(05):42-47.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2017.05.007]
点击复制

退化与正常山核桃林土壤细菌多样性比较研究()
分享到:

《浙江林业科技》[ISSN:1001-3776/CN:33-1112/S]

卷:
37
期数:
2017年05期
页码:
42-47
栏目:
出版日期:
2017-11-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison on Soil Bacteria Diversity between Degrated and Healthy Carya cathayensis Forests
作者:
李皓1董建华1董建明2袁紫倩1胡俊靖1赵伟明1
1. 杭州市林业科学研究院,浙江 杭州 310022;2. 杭州市临安区林业局,浙江 杭州 311300
Author(s):
LI Hao1DONG Jian-hua1DONG Jian-ming2YUAN Zi-qian1HU Jun-jing1ZHAO Wei-ming1
1. Hangzhou Forestry Academy of Zhejiang, Hangzhou 310022, China; 2. Lin’an Forestry Bureau of Zhejiang, Hangzhou 311300, China
关键词:
山核桃退化土壤细菌群落16SrDNA 测序多样性
Keywords:
Carya cathayensis degraded soil bacteria community 16SrDNA sequencing diversity
分类号:
S664.1
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2017.05.007
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
2014 年10 月,在浙江省临安市选择4 个退化山核桃Carya cathayensis 林样地和2 个正常山核桃林样地,采土样后用16SrDNA 测序技术分析两种林地土壤细菌多样性。结果表明,6 个样地土壤细菌共有36 门75 纲96目224 科924 属。在门的水平上,退化和正常林地细菌主要类群基本一致,主要类群有变形菌门Proteobacteria,酸杆菌门Acidobacteria,拟杆菌门Bacteroidetes,绿弯菌门Chloroflexi,厚壁菌门Firmicutes,疣微菌门Verrucomicrobia,放线菌门Actinobacteria 和浮霉菌门Planctomycetes,但不同林地中各类群相对丰度明显不同;在属的水平上,退化和正常林地差别很大。Alpha 多样性分析显示,6 个样地Shannon 指数,ACE 指数,Chao1指数的排序各不相同,分析说明山核桃林退化程度与土壤细菌数量和多样性无关。相关分析结果表明,ACE 指数与交换性H+显著相关,其余土壤物理化学性质与细菌多样性指数均无显著相关性。
Abstract:
Four sample plots in degraded Carya cathayensis stand and 2 in normal ones were established in October 2014 in Lin’an district, Zhejiangprovince. Soil samples were sequenced by 16SrDNA for comparison on bacteria community diversity of different sample plots. The results indicatedthat there were 924 genera of 224 families and 36 phylums, 75 classes, 96 orders in sampled plots. The main phylums were the same in the testedplots, included Proteobacteria, Acidobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Chloroflexi, Firmicutes, Verrucomicrobia, Actinobacteria and Planctomycetesbut withdifferent relative abundance . The distribution of main genera had great difference between degraded and normal plots. The Shannon index, the ACEindex and Chao1 index showed that it had no relationship between degradation of sampled stands with bacteria richness and diversity. Correlationanalysis demonstrated that ACE index had evident relation with H+, the other physiochemical properties of the tested had no significant correlationwith bacteria diversity index.

参考文献/References:

[1] Fierer N,Jackson R B. The diversity and biogeography of soil bacterial communities[J]. Proceed Natl Acad Sci U S A,2006,103(3):626-631.
[2] Chen Q H,Feng Y,Zhang Y P,et.al. Short-term responses of nitrogen mineralization and microbial community to moisture regimes ingreenhouse vegetable soils[J]. 土壤圈(英文版),2012,22(2):263-272.
[3] 李桥. 基于高通量测序技术下土壤微生物群落结构的研究[D]. 济南:山东师范大学,2011.
[4] 曾希柏,王亚男,王玉忠,等. 不同施肥模式对设施菜地细菌群落结构及丰度的影响[J]. 中国农业科学,2013,46(1):69-79.
[5] 张彩霞. 新一代高通量测序技术研究土壤微生物群落结构对环境条件的响应[D]. 南京:南京农业大学,2012.
[6] 秦楠,栗东芳,杨瑞馥. 高通量测序技术及其在微生物学研究中的应用[J]. 微生物学报,2011,51(4):445-457.
[7] 宋素灵. 山核桃林地土壤退化现状和施肥改良研究[D]. 临安:浙江农林大学,2014.
[8] 杨菁,周国英,田媛嫒,等. 降香黄檀不同混交林土壤细菌多样性差异分析[J]. 生态学报,2015,35(24):8117-8127.
[9] 常显波,刘举,等. 不同种植年限苹果园土壤理化性质及微生物数量[J]. 安徽农业科学,2007,35(5):1423-1426.
[10] 黄珍. 海南福山香蕉地土壤细菌和真菌多样性分析[D]. 海南:海南大学,2010.
[11] Peck G M,Merwin I A,Thies J E,et.al. Soil properties change during the transition to integrated and organic apple production in a New Yorkorchard[J]. App Soil Ecol,2011,48:18-30.
[12] 贾丽. 珍稀濒危植物白皮松土壤微生物多样性研究[D]. 兰州:西北师范大学,2007.

相似文献/References:

[1]陈友吾,沈建军,叶华琳,等.美国山核桃与山核桃叶片挥发性物质的比较和分析[J].浙江林业科技,2015,35(02):8.
[2]马闪闪,程礼泽,丁立忠,等.硼锌铜微肥配施对山核桃生长和产量的影响[J].浙江林业科技,2016,36(02):31.
 MA Shan-shan,CHENG Li-ze,DING Li-zhong,et al.Application of B, Zn and Cu Fertilizer on Growth and Yield ofCarya cathayensis[J].Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology,2016,36(05):31.
[3]陆 冰,陆 飞*.山核桃外果皮化学成分分析及应用研究进展[J].浙江林业科技,2016,36(06):78.
 LU Bing,LU Fei*.Advance on Chemical Composition from Epicarp of Carya cathayensisand Their Application[J].Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology,2016,36(05):78.
[4]徐亚楠,周伟,叶晓明,等.山核桃种子生长发育过程油脂含量及脂肪酸的动态变化[J].浙江林业科技,2017,37(02):10.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2017.02.002]
 XU Ya-nan,ZHOU Wei,YE Xiao-ming,et al.Dynamic Changes of Oil Content and Fatty Acids in Seeds of Carya cathayensis at DifferentGrowth Stage[J].Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology,2017,37(05):10.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2017.02.002]
[5]王莺,陆荣杰,吴家森,等.山核桃林坡地氮磷流失年动态规律初步研究[J].浙江林业科技,2017,37(04):77.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2017.04.014]
 WANG Ying,LU Rong-jie,WU Jia-sen,et al.Preliminary Study on Annual Dynamics of Nitrogen and Phosphorus Losses at Carya cathayensis Stand on Slope[J].Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology,2017,37(05):77.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2017.04.014]
[6]刘锦,于炜.山核桃干腐病研究进展[J].浙江林业科技,2017,37(06):99.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2017.06.018]
 LIU Jin,YU Wei.Researches on Canker of Carya cathayensis[J].Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology,2017,37(05):99.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2017.06.018]
[7]董建华,赵伟明,周建金,等.临安区山核桃林不同地质背景下的土壤肥力特性研究[J].浙江林业科技,2018,38(02):14.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2018.02.003]
[8]李 皓,董建华,袁紫倩,等.山核桃林地土壤真菌群落结构研究[J].浙江林业科技,2018,38(05):67.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2018.05.011]
 LI Hao,DONG Jian-hua,YUAN Zi-qian,et al.Soil Fungi Community Structure in Caryacathayensis Forest[J].Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology,2018,38(05):67.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2018.05.011]
[9]余 琪,张深梅,郑 浩,等.山核桃异砧嫁接苗生长特性观察[J].浙江林业科技,2019,39(02):15.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2019.02.003]
 YU Qi,ZHANG Shen-mei,ZHENG Hao,et al.Observation on Growth of Carya cathayensis Grafted on Different Rootstocks[J].Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology,2019,39(05):15.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2019.02.003]
[10]丁立忠,金锦,汪智勇,等.临安不同产区镇山核桃林地土壤肥力水平的变化研究[J].浙江林业科技,2020,40(03):45.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2020.03.007]
 DING Li-zhong,JIN Jin,WANG Zhi-yong,et al.Changes of Soil Fertility in Carya cathayensis Stands in Major Production Towns of Lin’an City[J].Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology,2020,40(05):45.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2020.03.007]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2017-03-21;修回日期:2017-08-13基金项目:浙江省林业科研成果推广项目(2013B13)作者简介:李皓,工程师,从事经济林研究;E-mail:38761202@qq.com。
更新日期/Last Update: 2017-10-20